He played a role in the modern East, borrowed from Europe with the help of colonial practice of independent judicial authorities. Let it is borrowed in different ways (in India it introduced the English, she came to Turkey in the course of radical reforms of Ataturk, and TP), important is the principle that the European type of proceedings entered into many countries of the East, and it has played an important role there, although in many cases, particularly in Islamic countries, continued to exist in parallel, and a traditional court. Along with the independence of the court and entered in most cases it occupied high position European origin the idea of ??separation of powers required in the practice of republican government, parliamentary democracy. Not alien to many countries of the East and modern borrowed from Europe the idea of ??individual freedom, the principle of civil society, the phenomenon of the rule of law - something that is nowhere and never before in the East was not, and could not be. All this, regardless of the acquisition mechanism (implanted in the colonies and in dependent countries was seen during the reforms; reforms were characteristic for the politically independent states, such as the same in Japan, although there is a role played by the American military occupation after World War II), can be considered in the East legacy of colonialism, t. e. the result of the purposeful. active policy, which was borrowing vector evrokapitalisticheskogo standard.